🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it appears it’s time for a reassessment. Throughout its history, an celebration that began as a festivity and recollection of history, culture and the connections between Black populations worldwide, has adopted a commercial tone, broadening to incorporate events where African descendants are compensated to address predominantly white listeners about “unconscious bias” and active solidarity. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade sparked an increase in the business of showcasing anti-racist commitment. Yet, that phase is now over. The surge has reached its height, producing a diluted aftermath of what raising awareness is for.

The History of Black History Month

Initially celebrated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with a week of commemoration and observance in the February's second week. Black History Month evolved from this movement and was officially launched in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the US and Canada in winter, but also in October in the Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, Éire and the Netherlands.

The observance has transformed since those days, focusing less on the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and struggles for equality, and increasingly on prominent Black figures in government, the arts, and social movements, and broadly celebrating the impact Black people have made to mold society. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with lectures and artistic activities. But the way the celebration is commemorated is a indication of the current political situation. How it develops is a instructive case in how appropriation leads to erosion: the reshaping of Black History Month has impeded the point of it, which is to address systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Troubling Time

Hardly anything shows how crucial it is to rethink Black History Month more than the particular moment in which it takes place this year. In the UK, a resurgent right in the shape of the Reform organization is ahead in surveys. In the warmer months we witnessed the largest far-right rally in British history. Kemi Badenoch, the Black leader of the Conservative party, is a staunch adversary of the racial justice movement, and we are in a place where a legislator feels emboldened to say that a lack of white people in parts of a city is a reason for concern. Simultaneously, far-right parties are surging in the EU as a whole.

In the United States, a colossal assault against DEI and affirmative action has been taken, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the top legal institutions of the nation. A drive to remove the history of people of color and narrative from the archives is under way. One of the former president's first executive orders targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a “concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation’s history” by representing the nation “as inherently racist”.

Given these circumstances, the month symbolises how insufficiently it can be impactful if it is confined to either dutiful corporate observances, or politically neutered festivities of contributions in the past, rather than addressing the conditions of the present. It also demonstrates how its short period means that it is detached from the more extensive continuous action that is necessary. An academic expert, a educator at a learning establishment, put it best when she voiced worries about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The problem with taking a tokenistic approach”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a transient display rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Determining how to adjust, modify and expand efforts for equal rights and acknowledgment in such times of discouragement and concern is a difficult task. There is a temptation to just discontinue events including Black History Month entirely, assuming they are simply not fit for purpose, or are remnants of an era that has been ineffective.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and heritage of racial movements – community-based BLM initiatives, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and yes, even those talks to businesses – form an framework that a lot of work has been invested in. It is there not merely to decline as the politics moves on (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month seem? Firstly, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is distributed through the year (as various establishments are already beginning to do), elements of its material (particularly around notable African descendants) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a time that does not avoid politics, and provides room for people, particularly the younger generation, to air their fears and experiences. What value has simple recognition of the history when it doesn’t reckon with the current situation of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the public spaces? Institutions who mark it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of hidden discrimination and alertness to subtle slights, but confronted with the risks that face all if fight against prejudice is not taken seriously. In short, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, critical, and adaptive. It could be that an entire name rebrand is required – Black History is Now Month.